|

11-17-2009, 10:28 AM
|
|
|
 |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Panamon777
Tyler Cowen talks about health care reform. He mentions some good talking points but I do not think he gets to the core issues at all. I don't know if that's by choice (he limited his analysis to politically feasible options) or if what he posted is really his best solution.
|
I just read that a bit ago and was fairly disappointed. He does say these are not his first, or even second best solutions. As he put it, he's starting with the pieces already on the table and rearranging them. So he's basically staying within the current democratic-majority framework and trying to come up with something better, but that wouldn't stray from that framework.
I agree that he doesn't really get into the core issues, which is probably a commentary on the deficiency of the current framework as anything. Some of it even seemed surprisingly naive, such as when he calls for an "all-out attempt" to do this or that thing which hasn't happened in the past, despite knowing they need to be done, because of distorted incentive structures which he does not address. Those are wishful thinking, at best.
Quote:
|
I do not think either current party is able to offer a solution. Both seem intent on passing bills, when I think the best thing for the country is to not pass anything. (Or repeal things.)
|
There is indeed a definitive bias in government to "do something." To pass new legislation whether it's needed or not, or whether better approaches exist. As you say, it spans both parties.
Last edited by Grst : 11-17-2009 at 11:08 PM.
| |